COD WW2 v BF1 article


Its well balanced and decent post, worthy of a read if you fancy it.

It’s all a question of pace. WW2’s breathless multiplayer is crazy rewarding – from those always smooth controls to unlocking killstreak rewards to the satisfyingly tactile hit markers, it’s all pure adrenaline for your senses. Over on the Battlefield, the game’s heavy focus on precision and control means every frenzied fight feels hard-fought and hard-won.

Everyone gets a medal.


Honestly don’t understand the point of these today. They both provide different experiences, so doing a comparison of this isn’t so much “buyer’s guide” but “fan wankery”.

The fact their final answer is “both do different things MEDALS FOR EVERYONE” just highlights the pointlessness of the video and it’s click-bait naming title.